USPTO serial 76241656
TTCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TTCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J.W. Gipple
J W GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALEP O BOX 40513WASHINGTON, DC 20016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS, NAMELY ELECTRICAL AMPLIFIERS, SWITCHES, OSCILLATORS, CELL SWITCHES, COILS, CAPACITORS, COMMUTATORS, CONNECTORS, CONVERTERS, FUSES AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS, MICROPROCESSOR AND SEMI-CONDUCTORS; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT PARTS FOR TRANSMISSIONS, SIGNALING, CODING, DECODING, CODE CONVERSION, ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT PARTS FOR MODULATION OR DEMODULATION OF SCHEDULED DATA TRANSMISSION AND/OR RECEPTION; NETWORKING DEVICES FOR SCHEDULED, DIGITAL/BINARY DATA TRANSMISSION AND/OR RECEPTION; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING IN THE FIELD OF SCHEDULED DIGITAL/BINARY DATA TRANSMISSION AND/OR RECEPTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |