USPTO serial 76242399
SUGAR LIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2896061Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2004
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUGAR LIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
Aventura, FL
Other trademarks owned by The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
Aventura, FL
Other trademarks owned by The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
Aventura, FL
Other trademarks owned by The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Lipstick | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by The Natalie Anderson and Emily Brause Partnership
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SUGAR LIPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 26, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 26, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 12, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |