USPTO serial 76243534
ECO - POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECO - POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SERVICIOS CONDUMEX S.A. DE C.V.
76120 Queretaro, Qro, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carmen B. Pili
CARMEN B PILI LAW OFFICE OF CARMEN PILI EKSTROM727 SUNSHINE DRLOS ALTOS, CA 94024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | GOODS FOR TRUNK AND DISTRIBUTION CABLES, NAMELY COAXIAL CABLE AND STORAGE REELS FOR ELECTRIC WIRE, FIBER OPTIC CABLES TELEVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, ELECTRIC SHIELDING FOR CABLES AND CABLE ASSEMBLIES, CABLE CONNECTORS, CABLE JUMP LEADS, INSULATORS FOR ELECTRIC CABLES, JUMPER CABLES, ELECTRICAL CABLES, ELECTRICAL SHIELDING SPACERS FOR CABLES AND CABLE ASSEMBLIES, METAL CABLE WIRE, AND POWER CABLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |