USPTO serial 76246539
MULTIVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
GEORGE A PELLETIER JR CANTOR COLBURN LLP55 GRIFFIN RD SBLOOMFIELD, CT 06002-1353UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Vacuum and atmospheric furnaces and their parts for the heat treatment of metallic workpieces; vacuum chambers that can be conveyed on moveable platforms with internal and external loading apparati for the transport of workpieces | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |