USPTO serial 76247488
WOMYN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOMYN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Godler
MARK D GODLER KAYE SCHOLER LLP425 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-3506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's clothing, namely, hosiery, socks, stockings, jackets, blazers, coats, rainwear, sweaters, pants, jeans, vests, dresses, skirts, blouses, t-shirts, sleepwear, shoes, sandals, boots, footwear, hats, belts, headbands and scarves | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |