Drawing for SNOW QUEEN

USPTO serial 76250861

SNOW QUEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNOW QUEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elena Muravina

Elena Muravina, Esq. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman, LLP9601 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 710Beverly Hills, CA 90210-5288

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032beer, mineral water and carbonated soft drinksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 5, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 24, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 9, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 18, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance