Drawing for PARLIAMENT OF THE U.K.

USPTO serial 76250864

PARLIAMENT OF THE U.K.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARLIAMENT OF THE U.K.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elena Muravina

Elena Muravina, Esq. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman, LLP9601 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 710Beverly Hills, CA 90210-5288

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wines and spirits, namely, cognac, liqueurs, rum and vodkaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 24, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 23, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 12, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 15, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 15, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 18, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 13, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 5, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Mar 27, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance