Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76250866?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76250866. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76250866, the listed owner(s) include: WTM ESTABLISHMENT, ROMAN & PARK, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 76250866?

Serial number 76250866 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN?

PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN (76250866) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN?

The public record lists International Classes: 032. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN Serial# 76250866 | status 601; last event MAB1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

WTM ESTABLISHMENT
VADUZ, CH
Other trademarks owned by WTM ESTABLISHMENT
ROMAN & PARK, INC.
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by ROMAN & PARK, INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elena Muravina

Elena Muravina, Esq. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman, LLP9601 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 710Beverly Hills, CA 90210-5288

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
032	beer, mineral water and carbonated soft drinks	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 24, 2009	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Dec 24, 2009	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Dec 23, 2009	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Nov 30, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
May 26, 2009	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Feb 12, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 25, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
May 21, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Nov 21, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jul 6, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
May 1, 2007	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
May 1, 2007	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Apr 18, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 18, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Mar 15, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 15, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2006	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Jan 30, 2006	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 16, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jun 28, 2005	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Dec 27, 2004	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Dec 12, 2003	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Apr 30, 2002	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Dec 20, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 16, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

PARLIAMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN