USPTO serial 76254257
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N ARONSON
JEFFREY R COHEN MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume and bath products, namely perfume, eau de cologne, toilet water, sachets, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, bath salts, bubble bath, skin soap, deodorant soap, liquid soap, toilet soap and body powder | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Sunglasses | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | jewelry | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | leather and imitation of leather, namely wallets, traveling bags, handbags | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals and, sneakers; clothing-namely, pants, skirts, shirts, blouses, dresses, jumpsuits, jackets, outerwear, hats, underwear, swimwear, t-shirts, belts, hosiery and socks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |