USPTO serial 76254508
LASERTECHNICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LASERTECHNICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mr. Robert Klump
MR ROBERT KLUMP VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL MANAGERLASERTECHNICS INC5500 WILSHIRE AVE NEALBUQUERQUE, NM 87113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PRODUCT HANDLING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, CONVEYORS, INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS USED FOR POSITIONING PRODUCTS AND COMPONENTS, INDUSTRIAL PICK-AND PLACE MACHINES, SINGLE AND DUAL AXIS PROGRAMMABLE POSITIONING STAGES, ROTARY INDEXING TABLES AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL POSITIONING AND HANDLING MACHINES EMPLOYED FOR CONTAINING, CONTROLLING, AND MOVING PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | LASER MARKING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF LASERS, POWER SUPPLIES, AND COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, NAMELY PERSONAL COMPUTERS, PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLERS, AND IMBEDDED PROCESSORS; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS USED FOR CONTROL AND OPERATION OF THE AFORESAID LASER MARKING SYSTEMS; BEAM DELIVERY OPTICS; AND COMPONENT SUPPORT FRAMEWORK, NAMELY, THE MECHANICAL STRUCTURES EMPLOYED TO MOUNT AND SUPPORT ALL OR A PORTION OF THE AFORESAID LASER MARKING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |