USPTO serial 76255130
RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
LOUISVILLE, CO
Louisville, CO
RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
LOUISVILLE, CO
RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
LOUISVILLE, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Hartman
ANDREW HARTMAN COOLEY GODWARD LLP380 INTERLOCKEN CRESCENT, STE 900BROOMFIELD, CO 80021-8023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Electronic storage of data | ACTIVE | Jul 9, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Evoke Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named RAINDANCE COMMUNICATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |