USPTO serial 76255553
REACHNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REACHNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. ROSINI
JAMES E ROSINI KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO LINK AFFILIATE WEB SITES TO A NETWORK AND ALLOW AFFILIATE WEB SITES TO GENERATE REVENUES BASED ON THEIR INTERACTIONS WITH SITE VISITORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | E-BUSINESS CONSULTATION REGARDING THE CREATION AND MANAGEMENT OF A NETWORK OF AFFILIATED WEB SITES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE INTO COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY TROUBLESHOOTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE PROBLEMS VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL, TELEPHONES, AND LIVE IN-PERSON INTERACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |