USPTO serial 76257685
COPTERCOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COPTERCOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. MORLEY DRUCKER
I MORLEY DRUCKER FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES, INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, AND COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES, CARTRIDGES, PROGRAMS, AND TAPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, TOY BENDABLE FIGURES, TOY ACTION FIGURE AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, TOY BANKS, TOY WATCHES, WIND-UP TOYS, TOY WALKIE-TALKIES, TOY 3-D VIEWERS AND REELS, ACTION SKILL GAMES, BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, PINBALL GAMES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS, CHILDREN'S PLAY COSMETICS, ROLE PLAYING GAMES, TARGET GAMES, TOY WEAPONS, PLASTIC PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS AND NOISEMAKERS, PLASTIC ACTION FIGURES, AND TOY FLYING DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |