Drawing for INTERNET COACH

USPTO serial 76258610

INTERNET COACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTERNET COACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Carrillo

Robert E. Browne Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLPSuite 22002 North LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60602

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertising and marketing materials via print media and the InternetACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 25, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Mar 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 28, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance