USPTO serial 76264610
BLOSSOM BOOSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2851285Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2004
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLOSSOM BOOSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Bridgeton, MO
Bridgeton, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth Solomon
CONNIE WOOTEN UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION2150 SCHUETZ RDSAINT LOUIS, MO 63146UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plant food, fertilizer for domestic use, and potting soil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHULTZ COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SCHULTZ COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SCHULTZ COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by . Schultz, Daniel J.
- Other trademarks owned by Schultz, Steven D.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named BLOSSOM BOOSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |