USPTO serial 76264952
SMARTBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2003
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Menomonee Falls, WI
Menomonee Falls, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marta S. Levine
MARTA S LEVINE QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 2550MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic power transfer and regulation equipment, namely capacitor banks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |