Drawing for ESPIRENCE

USPTO serial 76265377

ESPIRENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESPIRENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gilbert Lee Sandler

LAUREN V PEREZ THE WATERFORDSANDLER, TRAVIS & ROSENBERG, PA5200 BLUE LAGOON DRMIAMI, FL 33126-2022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Athletic bags, shoe bags for travel, overnight bags, umbrellas, backpacks, baby backpacks, duffel bags, tote bags, luggage, luggage tags, valises, attache cases, billfolds, wallets, briefcases, canes, business card cases, book bags, all purpose sports bags, gym bags, purses, coin purses, fanny packs, waist packs, cosmetic cases sold empty, garment bags for travel, handbags, key cases, knapsacks, suitcases, toiletry cases sold empty, trunks for traveling, rucksacks, non-motorized collapsible luggage, leather shopping bags, leather handbags, leather book bags, leather clutch bags, leather luggage, shoulder bags, leather key chains, canvas bags for travel, carry-on bags, satchels, briefcases style portfolios, train cases, clutch purses, beach bags, change purses, wrist strap leather key chains, infant carriers worn on the body, animal skins and hides, mats and pads made of fabric for use with animal training and wheeled garment bagsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 10, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 8, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance