USPTO serial 76269792
INSIGHT SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSIGHT SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR INSPECTION AND DETECTION OF FOREIGN MATERIAL WITHIN CONTAINERS; BOTTLE HANDLING APPARATUS, NAMELY PROCESS CONVEYORS FOR HANDLING BOTTLES FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL, FOOD, BEVERAGE, WINE AND BREWING INDUSTRIES; BOTTLE FILLING MACHINES; MACHINES FOR DETECTION OF FOREIGN MATERIAL WITHIN FILLED CONTAINERS, MACHINES FOR WRAPPING, PACKAGING, LABELING AND STACKING PACKAGES; CONVEYORS; CARTON MAKING MACHINES; POWER OPERATED GUILLOTINE CUTTERS; AND PARTS FOR EACH OF THE AFORESAID MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC, OPTICAL AND SUPERVISION CHECKING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE, ELECTRONIC VIDEO CAMERAS, FRAME GRABBERS AND ILLUMINATORS CONSISTING OF LED'S AND HOUSINGS THEREFOR FOR CHECKING THE CONTENTS OF CONTAINERS FOR USE IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL, FOOD, BEVERAGE, WINE AND BREWING INDUSTRIES; ELECTRONIC MONITORING APPARATUS, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, ELECTRONIC SENSORS AND RECEIVERS ALL FOR DETECTING FOREIGN MATERIAL WITHIN FILLED CONTAINERS AND FOR USE IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL, FOOD, BEVERAGE, WINE AND BREWING INDUSTRIES; ELECTRONIC BOTTLE CHECKING CAMERAS; ELECTRONIC OPTICAL COMPUTER CONTROLLED MONITORING MACHINES FOR IDENTIFYING PHYSICAL DEFECTS LEAKAGE, FRACTURES, COSMETIC APPEARANCE, CAPPING, LABEL ORIENTATING OR OMISSION IN OR ON THE FILLED BOTTLE OR CONTAINER; PARTS FOR EACH OF THE AFORESAID GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |