USPTO serial 76274044
DATAGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATAGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Franksville, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rodney D. DeKruif
RODNEY D DEKRUIF WATERC/O REINHART, BOERNER, ET AL1000 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6648Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR INDUSTRIAL DRIVE AND CONTROL PRODUCTS; NAMELY, SOFTWARE TO PRESERVE SYSTEM CONFIGURATION AND RECEIVER DATA, ONLY COMPATIBLE WITH PROPRIETARY APPLICATION SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |