USPTO serial 76276285
FUN FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUN FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY J MULUTTA
ANTHONY J MULUTTA TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM, REDUCED FAT, LOW FAT AND FAT FREE ICE CREAM; ICE CREAM CONFECTIONS; ICE CREAM NOVELTIES; FROZEN DAIRY AND NON-DAIRY CONFECTIONS; FROZEN DAIRY AND NON-DAIRY DESSERTS, NAMELY, FROZEN COATED ICE CREAM AND ICE CREAM SANDWICHES; FROZEN REDUCED FAT, LOW FAT AND FAT FREE DAIRY AND NON-DAIRY DESSERTS, NAMELY, FROZEN CUSTARDS AND FROZEN PUDDINGS; ICE MILK, SORBETS, SHERBETS, FLAVORED WATER ICES, FROZEN FRUIT JUICE BARS, FROZEN FRUIT JUICE FLAVORED BARS; FROZEN YOGURT AND FAT FREE FROZEN YOGURT; FROZEN DAIRY SNACK KIT PRIMARILY CONSISTING OF A FROZEN DAIRY CONFECTION, A BAKERY GOOD, SUNDAE SAUCE, AND TOPPING MADE FROM CANDY, COOKIES, OR FRUIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |