USPTO serial 76276902
AEROFILTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARNER, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROFILTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Albans, AL1 3HW, GB
St. Albans, AL1 3HW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jodi-Ann McLane
JODI-ANN MCLANE SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903-7108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, inhalers for therapeutic use sold empty, dry powder inhalers for therapeutic use sold empty, filters for inhalers, and parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |