USPTO serial 76277157
LABELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LABELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alison B. Shames
ALISON B SHAMES HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY ET AL3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin cleansers; skin, hair, facial, and body lotions; skin toners; facial scrubs; skin moisturizers; sun protection products, namely, sun creams, sun block preparations, sun tan lotion, and after-sun lotions; eye creams; skin creams; foot creams; cuticle creams; non-medicated lip salves; skin clarifiers; bath soaps; facial oils; facial masques; facial peels; hair products, namely, non-medicated shampoo, hair conditioners, hair spray; scalp treatment products, namely, non-medicated cleaners, moisturizers, gels, and creams; nail polishes; cosmetics in the nature of makeup, namely, lipsticks, lip gloss, lip pencils, eye pencils, concealers, eye shadows, blushes, mascara, foundation makeup, eyebrow pencils, and eyebrow powders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |