USPTO serial 76279391
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Investeringsmaatschappij Helvetia B.V.
3743 DS BAARN, NL
Other trademarks owned by Investeringsmaatschappij Helvetia B.V.
Investeringsmaatschappij Helvetia B.V.
3743 DS BAARN, NL
Other trademarks owned by Investeringsmaatschappij Helvetia B.V.
3899 AZ ZEEWOLDE, NL
3899 AZ ZEEWOLDE, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky
Keith W. Medansky DLA Piper LLP (US)P.O. BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 24, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |