USPTO serial 76284357
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
6312 Steinhausen, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI JENKENS & GILCHRIST PARKER CHAPIN LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0002| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers and parts therefor, software; all the above goods for access protection, data security, encryption, data transmission and voice encryption for companies and public administrations | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely secure electronic transmission of data and voice for companies and public administrations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting classes and seminars in the field of the security of data and voice transmission and storage for companies and public administrations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design, consultation, implementation and monitoring of systems and solutions in the field of security data and vice transmission and storage for companies and public administrations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |