USPTO serial 76285440
IXE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IXE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Moxon II
GEORGE W MOXON II ROETZEL & ANDRESS LPA222 S MAIN STAKRON, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, financial valuation of insurance policies, actuarial services, accident insurance underwriting, fire insurance underwriting, marine insurance underwriting; insurance agencies in the fields of home, accident and life insurance; and financing insurance; insurance consultation services, namely probability analyses, loss analyses, and scientific expert opinions, all regarding phenomena and disasters being of relevance for insurance purposes; real estate management; lease of real property, agricultural facilities and farm land, leasing real property via the use of credit cards, lease of apartments; collections of rents; financial valuation of real estate property; deposit services for real estate titles; financial analysis, namely, estimation of financial risks related to real property; banking services namely; verification of checks; bail bonding; safe deposit box services; issue of travelers checks; currency exchange and advice; direct deposit banking services; bill payment services; financial transactions in the nature of electronic credit and debit card transactions; loan financing for pledges; securities services, namely, guaranteeing loans; deposit services for securities, cash; tax payment processing services; bonding services in the nature of issuing value bonds; savings and loan services; credit cards services; collection agency services for beneficiaries of insurance policies; financial consultation services in relation to the operation of financial institutions; financial services namely, wire transfer of funds; financial analysis, namely, evaluating and rendering opinions on the financial conditions of insurance companies; financial services regarding the holding of creditor's rights for the delivery of goods or resources namely, consulting services for financial institutions about the scope and applicability of creditors rights; financial services regarding capital contributions namely, valuation of capital contributions for the development of commercial activities; financial valuation of antiques, pieces of art, jewelry, numismatic appraisal; investment and trust company services namely, financial management of the fortunes of others; investment of funds for others, namely placement of liquid assets of others to create capital goods. stock brokerage; stock exchange market price quotations; customs brokerage; debt collection agencies, credit agencies, real estate agencies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |