USPTO serial 76286739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Stoughton, MA, US
Stoughton, MA, US
Stoughton, MA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JED HANSEN
JED HANSEN THORPE NORTH & WESTERN LLP175 SOUTH MAIN STREETSTE 900SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ADHESIVES FOR APPLYING FLOOR TILES | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 006 | ALUMINUM ENTRANCE MATS AND ENTRANCE GRIDS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 019 | FLOOR AND LANDING TILES OF PLASTIC AND RUBBER, AND NON-METAL PLAYGROUND SAFETY TILES; WALL-TO-WALL FLOOR COVERINGS, NAMELY, FIBER, PLASTIC AND RUBBER TILES [ ; STAIR NOSINGS ] | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 027 | FLOOR MAT SYSTEMS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF MATS MADE OF FIBER, PLASTIC OR RUBBER; LOGO MATS MADE PRIMARILY OF FIBER, PLASTIC OR RUBBER; FIBER, PLASTIC AND RUBBER MATS AND VINYL SHEETS FOR COVERING FLOORS AND WALLS; ANTI-SLIP FLOOR MATS AND ENTRANCE GRIDS MADE PRIMARILY OF FIBER, PLASTIC OR RUBBER; [ STAIR TREADS OF RUBBER; ] MATS USED IN WEIGHT LIFTING; MATS USED IN SPORTS AND FOR RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES; GYMNASIUM FLOOR COVERINGS; PLAYGROUND COVERINGS MADE OF RUBBER AND ELASTOMERS; ANTI-STATIC FLOOR MATS AND ANTI-FATIGUE FLOOR MATS MADE PRIMARILY OF FIBER, PLASTIC OR RUBBER; MATS USED IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS MADE OF RUBBER, PLASTIC, VINYL, SPONGE AND FIBERS, CARPET MATTING; [ ANTI-BREAKAGE FLOOR MATS MADE PRIMARILY OF FIBER,] PLASTIC OR RUBBER; VINYL INDOOR MATS; VINYL OUTDOOR MATS; MATS MADE FROM NATURAL FIBERS; MATS MADE FROM SYNTHETIC FIBERS; CARPET TILES | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
| 028 | PERSONAL EXERCISE MATS | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 23, 2026 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 10, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 10, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |