USPTO serial 76287614
BEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harmondsworth, West Drayton, UB7 OGB, GB
West Drayton, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN D. REICHMAN,
JONATHAN D REICHMAN, KENYON & KENYON,1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO TAPES, CASSETTES, DISCS AND MAGNETIC TAPES IN THE FORM OF AUDIO CARTRIDGES ALL RELATING TO AIRPLANES, AIR TRANSPORTATION AND/OR THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY; CINEMATOGRAPHIC SLIDES AND TRANSPARENCIES ALL RELATING TO AIRPLANES, AIR TRANSPORTATION OR THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY; VIDEO GAME DISCS; ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE NATURE OF INFORMATION DATABASES RELATING TO AIRPLANES, AIR TRANSPORTATION AND/OR THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTER GAMES WHICH INCLUDE FLIGHT SIMULATORS; CASES, BAGS, HOLDALLS, AND CONTAINERS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS; MAGNETS; MOUSE PADS; EGG TIMERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | WATCHES, CLOCKS, JEWELRY, PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS AND GOODS MADE IN PRECIOUS METALS OF THEIR ALLOYS OR COATED THEREWITH, NAMELY, BADGES, BELT BUCKLES, BLAZER BUTTONS, BUSTS, CANDLE RINGS, CANDLESTICKS, CIGARETTES AND/OR CIGAR CASES AND/OR BOXES, CASES FOR JEWELRY, CLIPS FOR HOLDING MONEY, COLLAR STUDS, COSMETIC CASES SOLD EMPTY, CUFF LINKS, DISHES, DRINKING VESSELS, GOBLETS, JUGS, KEY CHAINS, KEY CHARMS, KEY RINGS, LAPEL BUTTONS, MEDALLIONS, MUGS, PILL BOXES, PLATES, STATUETTES, TANKARDS, TIE CLIPS, TOBACCO BOXES AND/OR CASES, TRAYS AND TROPHIES ALL MADE IN PRECIOUS METALS OR THEIR ALLOYS OR COATED WITH PRECIOUS METALS OR THEIR ALLOYS, IMITATION JEWELRY; COSTUME JEWELRY; FLASKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | TYPING PAPER, CARDBOARD, PRINTED MATTER AND PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, BROCHURES, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS AND JOURNALS IN THE FIELD OF LIFESTYLE AND GENERAL INTEREST; POSTERS AND SPORTS TRADING CARDS; PHOTOGRAPHS; STATIONERY, ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, ARTISTS MATERIAL, NAMELY, PENS AND BRUSHES BEING ARTISTS MATERIALS; PENCILS; PENCIL CASES; DIARIES; PERSONAL ORGANIZERS; CALENDARS; WRAPPING PAPER; POSTCARDS; NOTE CARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | ALL PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS BACKPACKS AND SATCHELS HAVERSACKS; KNAPSACKS; RUCKSACKS; VALISES; WASH BAGS FOR CARRYING TOILETRIES; HOLDALLS AND CASES MADE OF LEATHER, IMITATION LEATHER OR TEXTILE MATERIALS; PURSES; POCKET WALLETS; DRAWSTRING POUCHES; UMBRELLAS; PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | SMALL DOMESTIC UTENSILS, NAMELY, MUGS, BOTTLE OPENERS, BOWLS, BREAD BINS, BREAD BOARDS, BUTTER DISH COVERS, CANDLE RINGS AND CANDLESTICKS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, COMB-CASES, COMBS, COOKIE JARS, CORKSCREWS, CROCKERY, CRUETS, EGG CUPS, DECANTERS, DISH COVERS, SOAP DISHES, SOAP DISPENSERS, DRINKING FLASKS DRINKING GLASSES, ICE BUCKETS, ICE CUBE MOLDS, JUGS, LUNCH BOXES, NON-METAL PIGGY BANKS, SALAD BOWLS, SALT CELLERS, SALT SHAKERS, SHAVING BRUSHES, SPONGES FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, SUGAR BOWLS, TANKARDS, TEA CADDIES, TEA INFUSERS, TEA STRAINERS, TOOTHBRUSHES, TOOTHPICKS AND HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS FOR FOOD; HAIR COMBS; BATH SPONGES; HAIR BRUSHES; NON-ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS AND MATERIALS ALL FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, NAMELY, ABRASIVE PADS AND SPONGES FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, CHAMOIS LEATHERS FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, CLOTHS FOR CLEANING PURPOSES, CLEANING WIPES; STEEL WOOL FOR CLEANING, BEVERAGE GLASSWARE; EARTHENWARE MUGS; PORCELAIN EGGS; CUPS; MUGS; SAUCERS; PLATES; OVEN GLOVES; FLASKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | BED, TABLE AND KITCHEN LINEN; FABRIC COVERINGS FOR FURNITURE PILLOWS OR CUSHIONS; TOWELS; FLANNELS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, TROUSERS, SHORTS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, JACKETS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, JUMPERS, CARDIGANS, COATS, JUMPSUITS, TRACKSUITS, OVERALLS, CAPS, HATS AND BELTS; FOOTWEAR AND HEADWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SKILL GAMES AND TOYS, NAMELY, BOARD GAMES, SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDING CARD GAMES AND EXCLUDING BOARD GAMES THAT FEATURE PLAYING CARDS AS A COMPONENT THEREOF, PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES, TOY BUCKETS, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, DOLL COSTUMES, FLYING DISCS, TOY GLIDERS, MODEL CARS, SCALE MODEL AIRPLANES, TOY SCALE MODEL ANIMALS, SCALE MODEL VEHICLES, BABY RATTLES, TOY SLEDGES, TOY SLEIGHS, TOY MODEL TRAIN SETS, WATER GUNS; SPORTING ARTICLES, namely, BASEBALL BATS, BALLS, NETS, PUNCHING BAGS, GOLF PUTTERS, TENNIS RACKETS AND TARGETS, ALL BEING SPORTING ARTICLES; SCALE MODEL AIRCRAFTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, COFFEE ESSENCE; COFFEE EXTRACTS; TEA; TEA EXTRACTS; COCOA; CHOCOLATE; CHOCOLATE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE BARS, CHOCOLATE CAKES; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, CANDY; BISCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by British Airways Plc
- Other trademarks owned by British Airways Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BEA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |