USPTO serial 76288696
E-LABORATORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-LABORATORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent M. Amberly
VINCENT M AMBERLY AMBERLY & ASSOCIATES7929 WESTPARK DR STE 202MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | "Computer software for use in the field of analytical chemistry through use on a compact disc, intranet or global computer network", | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |