USPTO serial 76294337
OVERDRAFT PRIVILEGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OVERDRAFT PRIVILEGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Mings
JOHN M MINGS FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP1301 MCKINNEY ST #5100HOUSTON, TX 77010-3095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Consultation in the field of financial overdraft management | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |