USPTO serial 76295275
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
SOUTH BEND, IN
SOUTH BEND, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea W. Gregory
ANDREA W GREGORY BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP2700 FIRST INDIANA PLZ135 N PENNSYLVANIA STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2400| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | accounting services; business services, namely, business management, e-business development and implementation, human resources services, and business processing consulting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |