USPTO serial 76295768
BR 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2004
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BR 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DUBLIN 2, IE
1724 Luxembourg, LU
SHERBROOKE, CA
Montreal, CA
Montreal, CA
Montreal, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
Frederick W. Meyers LADAS & PARRY LLPSUITE 1600224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUECHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | TRACKED UTILITY VEHICLES, NAMELY, SNOW GROOMERS AND TRACKED MAINTENANCE VEHICLES, NAMELY, EARTH MOVERS AND SIDEWALK SNOWPLOWS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INPROFI LTD
- Other trademarks owned by ROLIC INVEST SARL
- Other trademarks owned by CAMOPLAST INDUSTRIAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bombardier Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bombardier Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bombardier Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BR 2000
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |