USPTO serial 76296272
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rancho Cordova, CA
Rancho Cordova, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott M. Hervey
SCOTT M HERVEY WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK, ET AL400 CAPITOL MALL FL 11SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4407UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio and video tapes, compact discs, digital video discs and downloadable video recordings featuring interviews, documentaries, testimonials and music in the field of education, finance and personal growth | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |