Drawing for ANNOVATE

USPTO serial 76298094

ANNOVATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANNOVATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A. Donovan

MARY A DONOVAN DONOVAN & YEE LLP110 GREENE ST STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005ORAL CONTRACEPTIVESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 21, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 30, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 30, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 23, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 13, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 15, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 16, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance