USPTO serial 76301052
PARENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner
MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE STE 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | bedding, namely, bed linen, bed sheets, quilts, bed blankets, comforters, duvet covers, mattress covers, mattress pads, pillow shams, pillow cases, bed skirts and crib bumpers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing Co
- Other trademarks owned by Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing Co
- Other trademarks owned by MEREDITH CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named PARENTS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |