USPTO serial 76301393
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Washington, DC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan A. Smith
SUSAN A SMITH KENYON & KENYON333 W SAN CARLOS ST STE 600SAN JOSE, CA 95110-2731UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the mobile wireless electronic transmission of voice, data, paging and facsimiles; mobile wireless electronic voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; recording, storage, and subsequent wireless transmission of voice messages from and to mobile wireless telephones; call forwarding services; satellite transmission services; radio broadcasting services; cellular telephone communications services; paging services; wireless digital messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; facsimile services, namely, transmission and retrieval of facsimiles; digital messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic voicemail services; consulting services in the field of telecommunication, wireless, digital, and cellular telephone services and all types of wireless communication services; providing multiple-user access to global computer information networks; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users; telecommunication services; electronic communications services; multimedia services; Internet service provider services; online service provider services; and network services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |