Drawing for I-MODE

USPTO serial 76301393

I-MODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with I-MODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan A. Smith

SUSAN A SMITH KENYON & KENYON333 W SAN CARLOS ST STE 600SAN JOSE, CA 95110-2731UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, the mobile wireless electronic transmission of voice, data, paging and facsimiles; mobile wireless electronic voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; recording, storage, and subsequent wireless transmission of voice messages from and to mobile wireless telephones; call forwarding services; satellite transmission services; radio broadcasting services; cellular telephone communications services; paging services; wireless digital messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; facsimile services, namely, transmission and retrieval of facsimiles; digital messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; electronic voicemail services; consulting services in the field of telecommunication, wireless, digital, and cellular telephone services and all types of wireless communication services; providing multiple-user access to global computer information networks; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users; telecommunication services; electronic communications services; multimedia services; Internet service provider services; online service provider services; and network servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 28, 2008UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2008UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 16, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 7, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 12, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 16, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance