USPTO serial 76301556
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY AND GAMING CONTROL AGENCY ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura F. Davies Tilley
Laura F. Davies Tilley OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLA1800 WASHINGTON BLVDSte 330BALTIMORE, MD 21230-1732| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and amusements, namely, tickets for playing games of chance, namely, lottery tickets, keno cards, keno play slips, blank ticket stock paper, and lottery cards used in the conduct of the state lottery; beach balls, bags in the form of bowling bags and golf bags; golf equipment, namely, golf balls and golf tees; balloons; raffle drums; simulated lottery games consisting of a clear plastic globe on a stand, the globe contains balls with numbers on them and when the machine is plugged in a fan motor blows air and moves the balls, as a smaller version of the regular lottery game machine; raffle games, namely, raffle tickets which are handed out with half torn off and put in a fish bowl and half kept by the participants, tickets are drawn to determine winners; raffle tickets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |