USPTO serial 76302433
FIRE ANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRE ANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London SE1 0HA, GB
London SE1 0HA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0928UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | fire extinguishers, life saving apparatus and instruments, namely, automatic locks, close circuit television, distress signal receivers and emitters, electronic emergency cut-off valves and switches, electrical escape signs, and luminous escape signs; panic buttons, warning signs, warning sirens, automatic fire extinguishing systems, comprised of sprinklers; fire blankets, fire extinguishers, fire protection clothing; fire suppressors, heat protection clothing; fire sprinklers, crash helmets, escape ladders; safety equipment, namely, emergency warning lights and escape lighting; emergency cut-off valves, emergency lighting; safety belt cutters; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments for detecting fire, heat, smoke and toxic and noxious substances, namely, carbon monoxide detectors, fire detectors, gas detectors, heat detectors, radon detectors, rate of rise detectors, smoke alarms and smoke detectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |