USPTO serial 76302810
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana O. Lynch, Esquire
DANA O LYNCH ESQ WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON LLPSEVEN ST PAUL STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-1626UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use as a tutorial to educate individuals regarding their management of personal debt | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Printed educational and teaching materials for use in educating individuals regarding their management of personal debt | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Providing information to consumers regarding their management of personal debt via a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops and seminars for consumers in the field of management of personal debt and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |