USPTO serial 76305058
UBICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UBICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
78160 MARLY LE ROI, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MATERIAL TESTING AND REGULATING APPLIANCES AND INSTRUMENTS NAMELY OPTICAL FIBER TESTING AND REGULATING APPLIANCES AND INSTRUMENTS USED IN TELECOMMUNICATION, NETWORKS AND IN FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS; OPTICAL SPECTRUM ANALYZERS AND SPECTRUM ANALYZERS FOR FIBER-OPTIC NETWORKS, WAVELENGTH-DIVISION OPTICAL MULTIPLEXERS AND DEMULTIPLEXERS; OPTICAL SPECTRUM ANALYZERS AND SPECTRUM ANALYZERS FOR FIBER-OPTIC NETWORKS; OPTICAL REFLECTOMETERS AND POLARIMETERS MODAL DISTORTION IN A LIGHT BEAM MEASURING APPLIANCES; MULTI-WAVELENGTH LASER SOURCE APPLIANCES AND INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |