USPTO serial 76305807
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
REBER M BOULT STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE PA424 CHURCH ST STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing facilities for business meetings, seminars, conferences and exhibition space for business conventions; retail store services featuring candy, snacks, magazines, books, flowers, jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of live dramatic and non-dramatic performances; providing fitness facilities; providing facilities for educational meetings and seminars | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hotel services; resort hotel services; restaurant, food and beverage catering services; nightclubs; cocktail lounge services; barber shop and beauty salon services; providing facilities for social pre-function meetings; providing facilities for banquets and social function facilities for special occasions including weddings; providing facilities for exhibitions, conventions, and exhibition space for conventions; providing health spa facilities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |