USPTO serial 76305881
POOCH POPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2841880Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POOCH POPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chicago, IL
West Chicago, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | flavored liquid sold in packages to be frozen therein for pets for making pet ice cream; and frozen confections for pets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |