USPTO serial 76308157
COMAGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMAGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE LLPIP TRADEMARK GROUP1201 3RD AVE FL 48SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES, TRANSMISSION OF STREAMED SOUND AND AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDINGS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, DOCUMENTS AND MESSAGES, ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC, AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, IMAGES, SIGNALS AND MESSAGES, E-MAIL FORWARDING SERVICES, INTERNATIONAL, INTERSTATE AND INTRASTATE TELEPHONE SERVICES, LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES, ONLINE DOCUMENT DELIVERY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES; INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING REGULAR AND HIGH-SPEED MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ONLINE SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING REGULAR AND HIGH-SPEED MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO PRIVATE NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; NETWORK SERVICES, NAMELY, NETWORKING CONFERENCING SERVICES; CALL FORWARDING SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, THE MOBILE AND FIXED, WIRELESS, AND WIRE LINE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, PAGING AND FACSIMILES; MOBILE AND FIXED, WIRELESS, AND WIRE LINE ELECTRONIC VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES; RECORDING, STORAGE AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSMISSION OF VOICE MESSAGES FROM AND TO MOBILE AND FIXED WIRELESS TELEPHONES AND OTHER TELEPHONES; PROVIDING WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIERS LOCATED OUTSIDE OF NORTH AMERICA ACCESS TO THE NORTH AMERICAN CELLULAR NETWORK SATELLITE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; RADIO BROADCASTING SERVICES; WIRELESS, AND FIXED WIRELESS AND TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; PAGING SERVICES; WIRELESS DIGITAL MESSAGING SERVICES; TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES; PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES; FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SERVICES; ELECTRONIC VOICEMAIL SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATION, WIRELESS, DIGITAL, AND CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES AND ALL TYPES OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO ALLOW USERS TO INTERFACE WITH THE ONLINE DATABASES, ONLINE BULLETIN BOARDS AND ONLINE CHAT ROOMS OF OTHERS; PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT-ROOMS AND BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING TOPICS OF GENERAL INTEREST | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |