USPTO serial 76309785
CELINE DION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELINE DION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
#755, Laval (Quebec), CA
#755, Laval (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Dean
Jennifer L. Dean Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Calendars, trading cards, greeting cards; children's story books, address books, autograph books, date books, stationery paper, writing paper; activity books, activity charts in the nature of printed charts, all featuring detachable toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, coats, shoes, golf pants, golf shoes; beachwear, namely, robes; baby clothing, namely blouses, pants, dresses, sleepwear, shoes, booties, hats, jumpers | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Modeled plastic toy figurines, toy action figures, toy bendable figures, bean filled toys in the nature of bean bags, dolls and animals, musical toys, toy musical boxes, toy musical instruments; golf bags, golf gloves, golf putter covers, golf ball markers, golf tees; playthings for infants, namely, multiple activity toy sets composed of animal figurines, visual displays, soft blocks and toy figures; activity mats containing infant toys; babies' rattles; dolls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dion, Celine
- Other trademarks owned by Dion, Celine
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named CELINE DION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |