USPTO serial 76310006
SIMCOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMCOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
0161 Oslo, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur S. Garrett
ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N W, WA 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processors and computers; computer peripherals; digital simulators comprised of software simulating a visual scene similar to the surroundings experienced by surgeons performing coronary anastomis surgery; computer programs used for image guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures, and for supervising surgery, and for the teaching in surgery and interventional procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental, and veterinary apparatus and instruments used for image guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures namely, devices that are used to penetrate skin surfaces of human or animal bodies as part of treatment or diagnostic procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting classes, conferences, seminars and workshops in the field of image guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures; providing training in the use of computer programs for image-guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical treatment service; scientific and industrial research development, updating and maintenance of computer programs and other software for others; providing an interactive computer database in the field of image guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures; leasing of software programs used for image guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures or providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for image guided surgery and image guided interventional procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |