USPTO serial 76310192
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur S. Garrett
ARTHUR S GARRETT1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, electronic, optical, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision) and teaching apparatus and instruments; data processing equipment and computers; peripheral equipment for computers and data processing equipment; computer programmes | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical treatment; scientific and industrial research; preparation, updating and maintenance of computer programmes and other software; leasing access time to a computer database; leasing of software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |