USPTO serial 76310673
EASYMONEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASYMONEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Encino, CA
Encino, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT G. ROSENTHAL
ROBERT G ROSENTHAL ROSENTHAL & PUTTERMAN5856 FARINGDON PLRALEIGH, NC 27609-3931UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Re-chargeable debit card services for use in making electronic funds transfers, namely, making payments on a world wide computer network, direct payment for purchases, funds transfers to bank and checking accounts, and fees/earnings which are directly deposited into an account which can be used in the same manner as cash | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |