USPTO serial 76311398
MEDIFLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIFLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
64293 DARMSTADT 1, DE
64293 DARMSTADT 1, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brooks R. Bruneau
BROOKS R BRUNEAU MATHEWS, COLLINS, SHEPHERD & GOULD, PA100 THANET CIR STE 306PRINCETON, NJ 08540-3674UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Herbal teas, not for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |