Drawing for WHEN PERFORMANCE COUNTS, COUNT ON HYPERFORMIX!

USPTO serial 76312664

WHEN PERFORMANCE COUNTS, COUNT ON HYPERFORMIX!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEN PERFORMANCE COUNTS, COUNT ON HYPERFORMIX!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George R. Schultz

GEORGE R SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES PC5400 LBJ FREEWAY STE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, software for use in modeling and optimizing computer systems and for communication over computer networks excluding software for generating models of physical objects and defining machining tasksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 23, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Mar 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance