USPTO serial 76314749
TWINBLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWINBLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
83679 Sachsenkam, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON SCHEINER SCHULTZ & WAKEMAN612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202-3402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, footwear, underwear, stockings, pants, jackets, shirts, coats, overalls, caps, gloves, ski jackets, ski pants, ski suites, ski hats, and ski shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Skis, snowboards, mono skis, water skis, ski poles, surfboards, exercise bicycles, rowing machines, weight-lifting machines, dumbbells, footballs, handballs, golf balls, tennis balls, squash balls, table tennis balls, table tennis paddles, tennis rackets, golf clubs, archery bows, fishing tackle, exercise treadmills; exercise equipment, namely, cross trainers, steppers, moving walkways, rowing seats, dumbbell benches, spin trainers, and sport fishing spears | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |