USPTO serial 76320238
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Licensing of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2001 |
| 041 | Training services for computer software for collection, linking, organizing and [prioritizing data in the computer software and information and] prioritizing data in the computer software and information technology industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2002 |
| 042 | Computer software consultation; computer software development; installation of computer software; implementation of computer software; computer software configuration for others; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical support services related to implementing and maintaining computer software for collecting, organizing, prioritizing, and linking, namely, associating data, in the field of computer software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in database management and for organizing the unstructured databases and computer information of others; computer related services, namely, information technology consultation, namely, analysis and advice concerning ways to organize information contained in unstructured form, and in structured database form, into topical subject matter hierarchies for ease of access and searching; creation, enhancement, optimization, identification and organization of training sets for use in connection with data management software; creation of classification models and clustering groups of concepts and data for use in connection with data management software; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management and for organizing the unstructured databases and computer information of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |